SANOFI is vague about pay during recruitment

SANOFI fails to be upfront about a salary range when recruiting and employee reviews describe a corporate culture that lacks equality. SANOFI decision-makers view their rights and entitlements as exceeding those of workers to the point of driving inequality deeper.

Pay ambiguity in SANOFI job adverts represents a firm that doesn’t care about access and equality

Salary Secrecy

Inequality, the differences between rich and poor, and the challenges for ordinary people to be successful in pursuing economic opportunity, are worsening.

PaySlipBanSA has been consistently challenging them to respond to the question, how is pay secrecy fair to job applicants? We believe they are practising unfairly and demand a public response.

ARE MEN PAID MORE AT SANOFI?

While SANOFI believes they can avoid an official response, the privileged white men in their ranks have started crumbling beneath the ‘sexual tension.’

SANOFI men become abusive on social media — SANOFI should show integrity, not scorn society for challenging their conduct

SANOFI men are defensive as opposed to being upfront about compensation

sanofi refuses to address their recruitment issues so they diminish their importance — SANOFI can’t address the issues so they try to diminish them

SANOFI hired Kelly Recruitment whose ethics have long been questioned by us.

SANOFI and Kelly use business devices that flout legislation when they advertise without including pay ranges.

These deviant power games are played out in order to weaken job applicants’ wage negotiation ability. These firms use information asymmetry in order to coerce job applicants into accepting unfair wage offers.

Kelly is known to obstruct economic rights by unlawfully demanding payslips from potential candidates. Kelly ignores the Competition Act, and assumes collusion, price-fixing and poaching are legitimate practice.